News
As schools prepare to pay college athletes for the use of their name, image and likeness, details of proposed NIL contracts have been revealed.
The National Law University Delhi has launched the Eklavya Research Affiliation Programme (ERAP) in 2023, with the objective ...
1d
Inquirer.net on MSNOrtega: Names in Sara Duterte secret funds show ‘mastery of system’Having weird names to certify receipt of confidential fund (CF) disbursements from Vice President Sara Duterte’s offices may ...
The Institute of Measurement and Control Functional Safety Special Interest Group (FS-SIG) is responsible for promoting awareness and understanding of functional safety and is the Institute’s ...
1d
Inquirer.net on MSNOrtega: OVP, DepEd had chance to clear fund issue but they chose not toBoth the Office of the Vice President (OVP) and the Department of Education (DepEd) could have resolved issues surrounding ...
Corpse flower numbers are decreasing worldwide. Discover why conservation efforts struggle to maintain a healthy population.
Limits of Inherent Anticipation in Product-by-Process Claims - In Restem, LLC v. Jadi Cell, LLC, Appeal No. 23-2054, the Federal Circuit held ...
1d
Study Finds on MSNMysterious Deaths of 77 Dolphins in Florida Lagoon Finally Solved by ScientistsIn a nutshell Human-driven nutrient pollution triggered massive algal blooms in Florida’s Indian River Lagoon, which killed ...
5d
LAist on MSNHeavy metals in retardantLAist partnered with USC researchers to test samples of Phos-Chek, the fire retardant dropped on the Eaton and Palisades ...
6d
The Texas Tribune on MSNHere’s your guide to voting in Texas’s May 2025 local electionsHere’s your guide to voting in Texas’s May 2025 local elections” was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans ...
CESTAT Chennai Sets Aside Re-Determined Customs Valuation in Anisha Trends Case: The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai, ruled on an appeal filed by Anisha Trends ...
“1) For that, the Ld. CIT (A) has erred in deleting an addition of Rs.2,97,16,776/- made by the AO as unexplained expenditure u/s 69C of the Income Tax Act although no supporting bills for such ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results