March 18 - A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday affirmed that a work of art generated by artificial intelligence without human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law.

Abbott told a group of Baptist ministers in Austin on Thursday that he was backing a bill, filed by Republican Rep. Stan Gerdes from Smithville, that would ban “non-human” behavior in schools ...

Lynn Ray pointed to a dark rock propped against a lamp on one of the shelves that displays dozens of Chinese and Japanese art pieces and artifacts in his home. The rock would likely go unnoticed ...

Gov. Greg Abbott is resurfacing claims that public schools across the country are allowing students to act as “furries” in classrooms in his latest push to funnel taxpayer funds to private ...

The best in exhibits, parties, comedy, readings, tastings, classes, film festivals, WorldPride and more this Spring and ...

A dubious “Van Gogh” has sparked a battle between technology, connoisseurs, and the high-stakes art market. What does AI, which is transforming art authentication, have to say about the verdict?

It shows a lack of creativity, intellectual rigour and perhaps most of all laziness that may lead not just to a homogenisation of art, but also a homogenisation of culture.

WASHINGTON – A federal appeals court in Washington, DC, on March 18 affirmed that a work of art generated by artificial intelligence (AI) without human input cannot be copyrighted under US law.