Opinion: Tax Foundation's Sean Bray says ongoing battles over the global minimum tax are stifling foreign direct investment ...

These were the questions we addressed in a large study at the Social Economics Lab at Harvard, where we focus on how people ...

The zero-sum thinker frames the world in terms of winning and losing, us and them. If one person is to get richer, someone else must get poorer.

Zero-sum thinking refers to the fallacy that in the economy, one person’s gain is always another person’s loss. It is a belief anti-capitalists are profoundly convinced of, and Trump is too.

In “Zero Sum,” Charles Hecker chronicles this period, from the frenzied first moments of corporate investment in the midst of Soviet collapse to the run on business-class tickets that attended ...

For zero-sum thinking and scapegoating are the basis for Trump’s tariff policy. Zero-sum thinking refers to the fallacy that in the economy, one person’s gain is always another person’s loss.

Zero-sum thinking is destroying America We need to resist the temptation of thinking that someone else’s success comes at our expense.

Zero sum game in commercial real estate: The myth of winning at all costs The next time you’re sitting at the negotiation table, try to move away from the mindset of “if I win, you lose.” ...

In a zero-sum game, by contrast, the total rewards are fixed, so every gain comes at someone’s expense — one person getting more pie means another gets less.

Zero-based budgeting is a method where you allocate every penny of your monthly income toward expenses, savings and debt payments. Your income minus your expenditures should equal zero.

Zero-sum thinking can lead some to fear donor family connections. But love isn’t limited—embracing genetic ties can expand identity, belonging, and the meaning of family.