Introduction For more than two centuries, the United States has maintained—in law and in practice—a colonial system designed to destroy Indigenous peoples’ culture. My work has explored this ...
Creating more moments like the Smyrna experience requires that immigrants have the ability to take advantage of emerging opportunities, without major delays while visas are processed. 32Open this ...
In November, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 1Open this footnote Close this footnote 1 Robins v. Spokeo, Inc., 742 F.3d 409 (9th Cir. 2014), cert. granted, 135 S. Ct.
This essay is a reply to Daniel A. Crane’s Has the Obama Justice Department Reinvigorated Antitrust Enforcement?. Crane is simply wrong. The data regarding merger enforcement unambiguously support our ...
A Note for Readers: Adversarial collaborations are written by scholars who hold opposing views on their topic—together, they write one Essay to clarify points of agreement, precisely identify areas of ...
The Stanford Law Review is a legal publication run by Stanford Law School students since 1948, providing expert legal scholarship, analysis, and commentary.
The landscape of American history is littered with facially racist, misogynistic, homophobic, xenophobic, and other demeaning, marginalizing, and subordinating laws. Many more facially neutral laws ...
For Law Professors Rachel Arnow-Richman, Ian Ayres, Susan Bisom-Rapp, Tristin Green, Rebecca Lee, Ann McGinley, Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Nicole Porter, Vicki Schultz, and Brian Soucek Introduction We, ...
This Essay argues that legal challenges to Trump’s restrictive immigration policies should call out white nationalism as the underlying harm, both through raising equal protection claims and in ...
This episode and others are suggestive of the increasing strain on prosecutors charged with implementing Administration directives that may improperly target opponents or reward supporters. While ...
The Stanford Law Review is a legal publication run by Stanford Law School students since 1948, providing expert legal scholarship, analysis, and commentary.
In the first 100 days of his second term, President Donald Trump made a bid for stronger presidential control over federal spending. One key feature of this “appropriations presidentialism,” as two ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results