Why is the Ames decision potentially so significant It may very well signal the death knell of reverse discrimination as a ...

A Supreme Court ruling about discrimination claims was a win for the rule of law, not a judicial ideology, Bloomberg Opinion ...

The headline is correct; the court held unanimously that a straight woman who claimed she was discriminated against by her ...

The Supreme Court reached a unanimous decision in the Marlean Ames case. I hope this signals a genuine change of heart from the liberal justices.

High court levels the legal playing field, saying that everyone deserves the same protection from discrimination, including ...

The Trump administration’s focus on “reverse discrimination” against White people is not backed by data and reflects a ...

The lawyer who successfully argued Ames v. Ohio says the real win is for even-handed law, not for dismantling DEI.

Attorney Marc Brown said, "the floodgates have been let open" after the Supreme Court's ruling on reverse discrimination.

The decision is likely to make it easier for straight and white plaintiffs to allege reverse discrimination under federal civil rights law amid a wave of litigation over workplace DEI policies.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson — arguably the Supreme Court’s most progressive member — emphasized that the text of the law ...

A professor of law at Harvard University, he is author, most recently, of “To Be a Jew Today: A New Guide to God, Israel, and ...