Academics are accusing several AI startups of co-opting the peer review process at ICLR, a long-running AI conference, for ...
Hosted on MSN10d
'Vague, confusing, and did nothing to improve my work': How AI can undermine peer reviewEarlier this year I received comments on an academic manuscript of mine as part of the usual peer review process, and noticed ...
In 2023, an academic journal, the Annals of Operations Research, retracted an entire special isssue because the peer review process for it was compromised. The case brought into sharp focus broader ...
In a stark sign of scientists’ escalating frustration with how academic journals operate, researchers are taking on six ...
8d
MedPage Today on MSNNIH Move to Centralize Peer Review Worries Some ExpertsAccording to the release, the NIH's proposal to centralize peer review is "under review with implementation pending external ...
13d
News-Medical.Net on MSNNIH plans to centralize peer review process for grantsToday the National Institutes of Health is announcing plans to centralize peer review of all applications for grants, cooperative agreements and research and development contracts within the agency's ...
Queen’s researchers are investigating how scientific journals could improve their process for reviewing and publishing new papers. Can paying referees help?
The increasing involvement of AI in the peer review process raises concerns about its impact on academic publishing. An ...
Agency says move will save money and reduce bias, but researchers are concerned about associated staff reductions ...
Institutional peer review led to recommended changes in more than one-quarter of radiotherapy treatment plans, according to results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.Recommendations for changes ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results